If anyone tells you that the New York Times represents the US liberal media, keep in mind that the last two editorial "Room for Debate" features are (1) "
Should you be required to pay tax on purchases from Amazon?" (hint: this should not be up for debate in a functional society; while there is a legal basis for the question "should Amazon be required to collect the sales tax imposed on all buyers from a state?" the misleading framing of this question shows something about the state of the paper) and (2)
should employers be allowed to discriminate against the unemployed? (which features a George Mason law prof who doesn't bother to make specific arguments at all, just says "regulation makes jobs leave the state and/or country," a Big Lie in itself). There are actually things to talk about in (2), but ... if this is liberalism, it looks a lot like the Republican party circa 1970, plus some Ayn Rand types.
comments on DW | reply there. I have invites or you can use OpenID.